Gester Instruments | Professional Textile, Footwear and PPE Testing Equipments Manufacturers Since 1997
Analysis of the impact of the introduction of the environmental protection system on the textile industry
America in the 1960s—In the 1970s, there was a vigorous environmental protection movement. Since then, people in the society have begun to pay attention to the relationship between the environment and enterprises, and a variety of studies have also been carried out in academia. Compared with foreign countries, my country's study of the environment and enterprise relations started relatively late. With the development of my country's product export trade in recent years, the gradual improvement of laws and the intensification of the contradiction between the environment and production, Chinese scholars have begun to pay attention to this issue. and discuss it. Some scholars believe that the impact of environmental regulation on enterprises is negative and will reduce the profitability of enterprises. For example, Sancho, Tadeo&Martinez (2000) made an empirical study based on the efficiency index of Spanish furniture manufacturing and wood products, and obtained the result that environmental regulation has a negative effect on the production efficiency of the industry [2]. Shadbegian& Gray (2005) used an empirical analysis of the 1979—In 1990, the sample data of the steel, oil and paper industries in the United States found that the intensity of environmental regulation was negatively correlated with industrial productivity, indicating that environmental regulation had a negative impact on the industry [3]. Yao Lei and Ning Jun (2013) used an econometric model to conduct empirical research and obtained similar conclusions, that the export trade volume of textiles and clothing will shrink with the strengthening of strict environmental regulations [4]. Some scholars believe that environmental regulation will have a positive impact on enterprises, promote the development of enterprises and make them a better growth environment. For example, Mitsutsugu (2006) replaced the environmental regulation cost and technological innovation with pollution control expenditure and R&D investment, respectively. Through empirical research, it was found that the pollution control expenditure of high-pollution industries in Japan in the 1960s and 1970s was positively correlated with the technological innovation of enterprises [5] ]. Zhao Yuhuan (2009) used an empirical analysis method and found that my country's textile export volume was significantly positively correlated with the environmental cost of the textile industry, and the strengthening of environmental regulations would help increase my country's textile export volume [6]. Li Xiaoping, Lu Xianxiang, etc. (2012) adopted a survey of 30 industrial sectors in my country in 1998—Through empirical analysis of the data in 2008, it is concluded that the intensity of environmental regulation in the industrial sector can enhance the comparative advantage of industrial trade [7]. Other scholars believe that there is influence between the two, but the form of influence is more complicated. For example, Lanoie, Patry& Lajeunesse (2001) divided enterprises into two categories: those facing strong competition and those facing weak competition, when studying the impact of environmental regulation on the total factor productivity of enterprises. more significant [8]. Zhang Qian (2011) concluded that environmental protection intensity is negatively correlated with the revealed comparative advantage index and MI index of my country's textile and garment industry, and is positively correlated with the industry's international market share and trade competition index. It shows that environmental protection has both negative and positive effects on the international competitiveness of the industry[9]. Zhang Cheng, Lu Yang et al. (2011) used panel data to analyze the industrial sectors of 30 provinces in my country in 1998.—The model constructed between the intensity of environmental regulation and the progress of enterprise production technology during 2007 was studied, and the results showed that in the eastern and central regions, the production technology progress rate of enterprises was weakened at the initial weaker environmental regulation intensity, but as the environment increased. The increase in the intensity of regulation increases gradually, that is, there is a relationship between the two“U”type relationship, and there is no statistically significant relationship between the two in the western region.“U”type relationship [10]. Some scholars believe that the influence between the two is still unclear. For example, Busse (2004) used efforts to participate in international coordination and environmental management as surrogate variables for the intensity of environmental regulation in the HOV model. Environmental regulation standards have not led to a reduction in the international competitiveness of highly polluting industries, nor has the textile industry [11]. Fu Jingyan (2006) carefully analyzed various factors that affect the relationship between environment and competitiveness, and compared the impact of the internalization of environmental costs on the international competitiveness of some industries. [12]. Guo Hongyan, Liu Minquan, etc. (2011) concluded that the impact of environmental regulation on international competitiveness cannot be determined, and environmental regulation will affect the economy through various factors and channels. Only by combining these effects can the impact of environmental regulation on international competitiveness be shown. The final effect [13]. Obviously, scholars from all over the world have paid close attention to the relationship between environmental regulation and corporate trade. Through careful and rigorous research, they can be roughly divided into four viewpoints: First, the former has a negative impact on the latter, and the improvement of corporate environmental requirements will increase production. Costs while reducing profits;
GESTER International Co.,Limited shows how effective market design can encourage participation, reduce gaming, and aggregate information, in order to improve liquidity, efficiency, and equity in markets.
Super quality are in offer at GESTER Instruments, welcome to visit us.
tensile tester manufacturers textile testing equipment will help keep your tensile tester manufacturers in a tensile tester manufacturers state.
GESTER International Co.,Limited knew the only way to remain competitive was to ensure quality of service and customer satisfaction above all.
1. ISO 5402-1: Specifies the flexometer method for testing leather flex resistance under repeated bending.
2. ISO 17694: Defines test methods for footwear upper and lining flex resistance, simulating real-world bending stress to assess long-term durability.
C
Ball Burst Method (ASTM D3787): Steel ball penetration for textiles/films using testers like GT-C02-2.
Hydraulic Method (ISO 13938.1): Fluid pressure on rubber diaphragm for industrial fabrics via GT-C12A.
Pneumatic Method (ISO 13938.2): Compressed air for breathable materials tested with GT-C12B.
Results are influenced by raw materials, yarn properties,
Quick links